So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phát triển thang đo đa nhóm× | Phân tích nhân tố khám phá (EFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực≠ | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Thống kê |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1971 (multi-group CFA); 2000 (applied synthesis for scale development) | — |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Jöreskog, K. G. (multi-group SEM framework); systematised for scale development by Vandenberg & Lance (2000) | — |
| Loại≠ | Scale development / measurement model testing | Latent variable / dimension reduction |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | MGSD, cross-group scale development, multi-sample scale development, comparative scale construction | common factor analysis, açımlayıcı faktör analizi, factor analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-group scale development constructs and validates a measurement scale simultaneously across two or more distinct populations or groups. The approach integrates standard item generation and factor-analytic procedures with a systematic hierarchy of measurement invariance tests to ensure that the resulting scale measures the same construct in the same way in every target group. | Exploratory factor analysis reduces a large set of observed variables into a smaller number of latent common factors. It is widely used in scale development and psychometrics to uncover the dimensional structure that underlies a set of correlated items, without specifying that structure in advance. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|