So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Kiểm định tính bất biến của phép đo đa nhóm× | Phân tích nhân tố khẳng định (Confirmatory Factor Analysis - CFA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1971–1993 | 1969 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1971); Meredith, W. (1993) | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| Loại≠ | Model comparison / hypothesis testing | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | measurement invariance, factorial invariance, cross-group invariance, MI testing | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 4 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-group measurement invariance testing examines whether a latent construct is measured in the same way across two or more distinct groups — such as cultures, genders, or age cohorts. It is a prerequisite for meaningful group comparisons of latent means or relationships, ensuring that observed score differences reflect true differences rather than measurement artifacts. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|