So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Phân tích mục theo nhóm đa dạng× | Chức năng biệt lập của mục (Differential Item Functioning - DIF)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Trắc lượng tâm lý | Trắc lượng tâm lý |
| Họ | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1986 | 1970s–1993 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Classical test theory tradition; systematised by Crocker & Algina (1986) | William H. Angoff and colleagues (ETS); systematized by Holland & Wainer |
| Loại≠ | Comparative item-level analysis | Item-level bias detection |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030616341 | Holland, P. W. & Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN: 978-0805809589 |
| Tên gọi khác | MGIA, group-comparative item analysis, subgroup item analysis, cross-group item analysis | DIF, item bias analysis, measurement non-equivalence, item-level measurement bias |
| Liên quan≠ | 6 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Multi-group item analysis computes classical item statistics — difficulty, discrimination, and corrected item-total correlations — separately for each subgroup in a sample and then compares those statistics across groups. It is a standard diagnostic step in scale development and test fairness evaluation, revealing items that behave differently for men versus women, across age cohorts, or across cultural groups before more formal DIF testing. | Differential item functioning identifies test or survey items that behave differently for examinees from different groups — such as gender, ethnicity, or language background — after controlling for the underlying ability or trait being measured. DIF analysis is essential for fairness evaluation in educational testing and psychological scale development. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|