ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Đánh giá giá trị phân biệt đa nhóm×Tính hợp lệ của cấu trúc×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng tâm lýTrắc lượng tâm lý
HọLatent structureLatent structure
Năm ra đời1981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s1955
Người khởi xướngFornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literatureLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
LoạiValidity assessment / model comparisonValidity evaluation framework
Công trình gốcFornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
Tên gọi kháccross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groupsconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Liên quan56
Tóm tắtMulti-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Multi-group discriminant validity · Construct Validity. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-15 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare