ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Độ tin cậy hội tụ đa nhóm×Đánh giá giá trị phân biệt đa nhóm×
Lĩnh vựcTrắc lượng tâm lýTrắc lượng tâm lý
HọLatent structureLatent structure
Năm ra đời1981 / 20001981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s
Người khởi xướngFornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension)Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literature
LoạiValidity assessment procedureValidity assessment / model comparison
Công trình gốcFornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗
Tên gọi kháccross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groupscross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groups
Liên quan65
Tóm tắtMulti-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework.Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Multi-group convergent validity · Multi-group discriminant validity. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare