So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| F1-score trung bình vi mô× | Độ chính xác× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Đánh giá mô hình | Đánh giá mô hình |
| Họ | MCDM | MCDM |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2000s | 20th century |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Multi-class evaluation community | Historical statistical foundations |
| Loại | Evaluation metric | Evaluation metric |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Powers, D. M. (2011). Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, 2(1), 37-63. link ↗ | Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | Micro F1, Frequency-weighted average F1 | Overall Accuracy, Correct Classification Rate |
| Liên quan≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Micro-averaged F1 computes the F1-score by aggregating true positives, false positives, and false negatives across all classes, then calculating a single metric. It is equivalent to accuracy in multi-class classification and is useful when class distributions reflect their natural importance. | Accuracy is the proportion of correct predictions among the total number of predictions made by a classification model. It is the most intuitive performance metric and measures how often the classifier makes correct predictions overall, regardless of class. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|