ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Ban Đạo đức trong Nghiên cứu×Các nguyên tắc về liêm chính nghiên cứu×
Lĩnh vựcĐạo đức nghiên cứuĐạo đức nghiên cứu
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19742007
Người khởi xướngU.S. Federal Requirement (National Research Act 1974); International adoption by WMA and research institutions globallyMultiple (National Academies, NIH/ORI, ESOMAR, individual discipline standards)
LoạiStandardFramework
Công trình gốcU.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Office of the Federal Register. link ↗National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. The National Academies Press. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácIRB, Research Ethics Committee, RECResponsible Conduct of Research, RCR, Research Ethics Standards
Liên quan44
Tóm tắtThe Institutional Review Board (IRB) is the independent ethics committee established at research institutions to review and approve human subjects research, ensuring compliance with ethical principles and federal regulations. Created as a legal requirement by the U.S. National Research Act (1974) and now adopted globally, the IRB serves as the primary mechanism for protecting research subjects while enabling legitimate research to proceed. No human subjects research can begin without IRB approval.Research integrity encompasses the ethical and professional standards that guide responsible conduct in all aspects of research—from study design and data collection through analysis, reporting, and publication. The core principles—honesty, transparency, accountability, respect, and stewardship—ensure that research is trustworthy, reproducible, and contributes legitimate knowledge. These principles are universal across disciplines and are enforced through institutional policies, professional standards, and regulatory oversight. Violations of research integrity undermine scientific credibility and can harm subjects, institutions, and public trust.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Institutional Review Board · Research Integrity Principles. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare