ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Hệ thống phân loại Kết quả Thực hiện×Khung RE-AIM×
Lĩnh vựcKhoa học triển khaiKhoa học triển khai
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời20111999
Người khởi xướngProctor, E. K., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., et al.Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., and colleagues
LoạiTaxonomyFramework
Công trình gốcProctor, E. K., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G. A., Bunger, A., ... & Rojas, D. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65-76. DOI ↗Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89(9), 1322-1327. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácimplementation outcomes, Proctor framework, implementation success measuresRE-AIM, REAIM, Glasgow framework
Liên quan55
Tóm tắtThe Implementation Outcome Taxonomy is a framework defining eight measurable dimensions for assessing implementation success: Acceptability, Adoption, Appropriateness, Feasibility, Fidelity, Implementation Cost, Penetration, and Sustainability. Developed by Proctor et al. (2011), it provides a standardized vocabulary and measurement approach to distinguish implementation process outcomes (how well was the intervention delivered?) from clinical outcomes (did patients get better?). This taxonomy is foundational to implementation science because it acknowledges that an evidence-based intervention can be effective (clinical outcome) but poorly implemented (implementation outcome), or feasible to deliver but not adopted by organizations.The RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) is a five-dimension evaluation tool designed to assess the public health impact of evidence-based interventions in real-world settings. Developed by Glasgow et al. (1999) to address the gap between efficacy trials (controlled conditions) and effectiveness in practice, RE-AIM provides a comprehensive set of metrics to determine whether an intervention is 'worth it' from both scientific and practical perspectives. It has become the standard framework for evaluating implementation success across health domains.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Implementation Outcome Taxonomy · RE-AIM Framework. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-17 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare