So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Bộ ước lượng Ghép Nối Hiệu ứng Điều trị Không đồng nhất× | Ghép Chính xác Tinh chỉnh (CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Suy luận nhân quả | Suy luận nhân quả |
| Họ | Regression model | Regression model |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 1997-2006 | 2011-2012 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | Heckman, Ichimura & Todd; Abadie & Imbens | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| Loại≠ | Causal inference / nonparametric matching | Matching / causal inference |
| Công trình gốc≠ | Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác≠ | HTE matching, subgroup matching estimator, conditional matching estimator, CATE matching | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| Liên quan | 6 | 6 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | The Heterogeneous Treatment Effect (HTE) Matching Estimator extends standard matching to recover how treatment impacts differ across subgroups or covariate values. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it pairs treated and control units on observed characteristics and then estimates the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) as a function of those characteristics — revealing who benefits most, least, or not at all. | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|