ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Thiết kế phương pháp hỗn hợp đa cấp định hướng đánh giá×Đánh giá Chương trình×
Lĩnh vựcThiết kế nghiên cứuPhương pháp thực địa
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời2000s–2010s1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
Người khởi xướngDonna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (systematization)Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
LoạiMixed methods evaluation designApplied evaluation methodology
Công trình gốcMertens, D. M. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975551Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
Tên gọi khácmultilevel mixed methods evaluation, hierarchical mixed methods evaluation, MLM mixed methods, nested mixed methods evaluationevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
Liên quan23
Tóm tắtEvaluation-oriented multilevel mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data across hierarchically nested levels of an organization or system — such as students within classrooms within schools — to evaluate a program, policy, or intervention. By capturing outcomes, processes, and contextual factors simultaneously at each level, this design produces richer evaluative inferences than either purely statistical multilevel models or single-level qualitative evaluations alone.Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Evaluation-oriented multilevel mixed methods · Program Evaluation. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-15 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare