So sánh phương pháp

	Cây quyết định tổ hợp	Cây Quyết định	Extra Trees
Lĩnh vực	Học máy	Học máy	Học máy
Họ	Machine learning	Machine learning	Machine learning
Năm ra đời	1996–2000	1984	2006
Người khởi xướng	Breiman, L.; Dietterich, T. G.	Breiman, Friedman, Olshen & Stone	Geurts, P.; Ernst, D.; Wehenkel, L.
Loại	Ensemble (multiple decision trees combined)	Recursive partitioning (if-then rules)	Ensemble (extremely randomized decision trees)
Công trình gốc	Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. In Multiple Classifier Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1857, pp. 1–15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.	Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A. & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth.	Geurts, P., Ernst, D. & Wehenkel, L. (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 63(1), 3–42.
Tên gọi khác	decision tree ensemble, ensemble of decision trees, combined decision trees, multiple classifier system (decision trees)	Karar Ağacı (Decision Tree), karar ağacı, classification tree, regression tree	Extremely Randomized Trees, ExtraTreesClassifier, ExtraTreesRegressor, ET
Liên quan	6	5	5
Tóm tắt	Ensemble Decision Tree methods train multiple decision trees and combine their outputs to produce predictions that are more accurate and stable than any single tree. Covering strategies such as bagging, random subspacing, and voting, they are among the most effective off-the-shelf techniques for tabular classification and regression tasks.	A Decision Tree is an interpretable classification and regression method, formalised by Breiman, Friedman, Olshen and Stone in their 1984 CART framework, that partitions the data with hierarchical if-then rules. Each split sends observations down one branch or another until a prediction is read off the leaf.	Extra Trees (Extremely Randomized Trees), introduced by Geurts, Ernst, and Wehenkel in 2006, is an ensemble of decision trees that pushes randomisation further than Random Forest. Both the candidate features and the split thresholds are chosen completely at random at each node, eliminating the greedy search over thresholds. This extra randomness reduces variance, often matches or exceeds Random Forest accuracy, and runs substantially faster at training time.