ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Phương pháp Delphi×Multi-Criteria Policy Analysis×Phân tích Kịch bản Chính sách×
Lĩnh vựcĐịnh tínhPublic PolicyMô phỏng
HọProcess / pipelineMCDMProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời196320021967–1990s
Người khởi xướngNorman Dalkey & Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation)Valerie Belton & Theodor Stewart (synthesis); MCDA traditionKahn, H. & Wiener, A. J. (seminal); adapted for policy by RAND Corporation and OECD
LoạiStructured iterative expert-elicitation processMulti-criteria decision analysis applied to policy appraisalQualitative-quantitative hybrid scenario method
Công trình gốcDalkey, N. & Helmer, O. (1963). An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. DOI ↗Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN: 9780792375050Swart, R., Raskin, P., Robinson, J. (2004). The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 137–146. DOI ↗
Tên gọi khácDelphi Yöntemi, Delphi technique, expert consensus methodMulti-Criteria Analysis for Policy, MCDA Policy Appraisal, MCA in Policy, Multi-Criteria Policy AppraisalPSA, Policy Scenarios, Policy Impact Scenario Analysis, Counterfactual Policy Analysis
Liên quan535
Tóm tắtThe Delphi method is a structured, iterative survey technique developed by Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer at the RAND Corporation in 1963 for eliciting and converging expert opinion on complex topics where empirical data are unavailable or insufficient. It collects independent judgements from a geographically dispersed expert panel over multiple anonymous rounds, feeding aggregated results back to participants after each round so they can revise their views in light of the group's collective position.Multi-criteria policy analysis applies multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to appraise and rank policy options against several, often conflicting, objectives that cannot be reduced to a single money metric. Each option is scored on a set of explicit criteria — economic, social, environmental, distributional — the criteria are weighted to reflect their relative importance, and the scores are aggregated into an overall value that ranks the options. Set out comprehensively in Belton and Stewart's 2002 textbook and operationalised for government in the UK's widely used Multi-Criteria Analysis Manual, the approach makes the trade-offs in a policy decision transparent and structured rather than implicit.Policy Scenario Analysis is a structured method for evaluating how different policy interventions perform across a range of plausible future states. By pairing specific policy levers with alternative scenarios, analysts can assess robustness, trade-offs, and unintended consequences of policy choices before implementation — making it a cornerstone of evidence-based policy design in fields from climate to public health.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 1 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Delphi Method · Multi-Criteria Policy Analysis · Policy Scenario Analysis. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-25 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare