So sánh phương pháp
Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.
| Gian lận và giả mạo dữ liệu× | Xung đột lợi ích trong nghiên cứu× | |
|---|---|---|
| Lĩnh vực | Đạo đức nghiên cứu | Đạo đức nghiên cứu |
| Họ | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Năm ra đời≠ | 2005 | 2013 |
| Người khởi xướng≠ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity; definitions in federal policy 42 CFR 93 | Multiple (NIH, ICMJE, institutional COI policies) |
| Loại≠ | Standard | Guideline |
| Công trình gốc≠ | U.S. Office of Research Integrity. (2005). Public Health Service Policy on Research Misconduct. 42 CFR Part 93. Definitions of fabrication and falsification. link ↗ | International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2023). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. ICMJE Recommendations for Manuscript Authorship. link ↗ |
| Tên gọi khác | FFP Data Violations, Data Integrity Violations | COI, Conflicts of Interest |
| Liên quan | 3 | 3 |
| Tóm tắt≠ | Data fabrication and falsification are serious forms of research misconduct involving intentional misrepresentation of research data. Fabrication means inventing data that were never actually collected; falsification means altering authentic data to change the meaning. Both undermine scientific integrity, waste research resources, and can harm research subjects and the public. Federal policy (42 CFR Part 93) formally defines these violations; detection is improving through statistical analysis tools and data transparency practices; prevention requires robust data governance and culture of accountability. | A conflict of interest (COI) in research exists when a researcher has financial, professional, or personal interests that might bias their research judgment or outcomes. Conflicts are inherent in research communities—researchers often have legitimate stakes in their research's success—but unmanaged conflicts compromise research integrity and public trust. Managing COI requires transparent disclosure, institutional oversight, and proactive mitigation strategies to minimize bias risk while allowing legitimate research to proceed. |
| ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu ↗ |
|
|