ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Bài báo hội thảo và kỷ yếu×Quy trình phản biện khoa học×
Lĩnh vựcViết học thuậtĐạo đức xuất bản
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19001665
Người khởi xướngAcademic conferences (20th century formalization)Scientific publishing community; formalized by journals and COPE
LoạiDocument TypeProcess
Công trình gốcInternational Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2023). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. ICMJE. link ↗Committee on Publication Ethics (2023). COPE Guidelines: Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. COPE. link ↗
Tên gọi khácconference abstract, conference proceedings, conference presentation, poster presentationPeer Reviewing, Manuscript Evaluation, Scholarly Review
Liên quan24
Tóm tắtA conference paper is original research presented at an academic conference, typically via oral presentation or poster. Conference papers are published in proceedings (collection of papers from a conference) and indexed in databases (Scopus, Web of Science). Unlike journal articles requiring 12–24 months for publication, conference papers are disseminated rapidly (often within weeks or months), making them valuable for communicating cutting-edge findings and early-stage research. Peer review rigor varies: some conferences employ rigorous peer review; others are less selective. Conference papers often precede or parallel journal publication, facilitating scholarly dialogue and networking.Peer review is the process by which manuscripts are evaluated by experts in the same field before publication in academic journals. Reviewers assess the manuscript's scientific merit, methodology, clarity, and contribution to the field. Established in 1665 with the first scientific journal (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society), peer review remains the gold standard for quality control in academic publishing. Despite ongoing criticism and proposals for alternatives, peer review continues to filter low-quality and unethical work, though it is imperfect and sometimes slow.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Conference Paper and Proceedings · Peer Review Process. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-19 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare