ScholarGate
Trợ lý

So sánh phương pháp

Xem các phương pháp đã chọn cạnh nhau; những hàng khác biệt được làm nổi bật.

Comparative Historical Analysis×Most Different Systems Design×
Lĩnh vựcPolitical SciencePolitical Science
HọProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Năm ra đời19791970
Người khởi xướngTheda Skocpol, Barrington Moore, James Mahoney & Dietrich Rueschemeyer (tradition)John Stuart Mill (method of agreement); Przeworski & Teune (systems framing)
LoạiMacro-causal, case-based comparative method with temporal emphasisSmall-N comparative case-selection design
Công trình gốcMahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
Tên gọi khácCHA, Macro-causal analysis, Historical-comparative method, Comparative historical sociologyMDSD, Most different cases design, Mill's method of agreement, Diverse systems design
Liên quan43
Tóm tắtComparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
ScholarGateBộ dữ liệu
  1. v1
  2. 2 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Nguồn tài liệu
  3. PUBLISHED

Đến trang tìm kiếm Tải xuống bản trình chiếu

ScholarGateSo sánh phương pháp: Comparative Historical Analysis · Most Different Systems Design. Truy cập ngày 2026-06-24 từ https://scholargate.app/vi/compare