Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Регресійний розривний дизайн в освітніх дослідженнях× | Зіставлення за показником схильності× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь≠ | Причинно-наслідковий висновок | Статистика досліджень |
| Родина≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1960 (origination); 1999-2010 (education economics canon) | 1983 |
| Автор методу≠ | Thistlethwaite & Campbell (1960); popularized in education economics by Angrist & Lavy (1999), Lee & Lemieux (2010) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| Тип≠ | Quasi-experimental causal inference | Method |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Lee, D. S., & Lemieux, T. (2010). Regression discontinuity designs in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(2), 281-355. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви≠ | RDD in education, education RD design, sharp RDD education, score-cutoff design | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| Пов'язані≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Підсумок≠ | Regression discontinuity design (RDD) in education research exploits a score-based eligibility cutoff — such as a test score threshold, GPA requirement, or age cutoff — to estimate the causal effect of a program, intervention, or policy on student or school outcomes. Units just below and just above the cutoff are treated as near-randomly assigned, enabling credible causal inference without a randomized trial. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|