Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Оцінювання політики за допомогою згрупованого точного співставлення (CEM)× | Збалансування ентропією× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Причинно-наслідковий висновок | Причинно-наслідковий висновок |
| Родина | Regression model | Regression model |
| Рік появи≠ | 2011-2012 | 2012 |
| Автор методу≠ | Iacus, King & Porro | Jens Hainmueller |
| Тип≠ | Matching / quasi-experimental design | Covariate-balancing reweighting |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | CEM, Coarsened Exact Matching, CEM policy evaluation, coarsening-based matching | EB, entropy reweighting, covariate balancing via entropy, Hainmueller balancing |
| Пов'язані≠ | 5 | 6 |
| Підсумок≠ | Coarsened Exact Matching (CEM) is a quasi-experimental causal-inference technique that creates balanced treatment and control groups from observational data by temporarily coarsening covariates into bins, exactly matching units within those bins, and then pruning unmatched observations before estimating policy effects. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro, CEM belongs to the monotonic imbalance bounding family of matching methods and is especially popular in policy evaluation. | Entropy balancing is a preprocessing method for causal inference that assigns weights to control-group units so that the reweighted control sample matches the treatment group exactly on a chosen set of covariate moments (means, variances, skewness). Introduced by Hainmueller (2012), it replaces trial-and-error propensity-score trimming with a constrained maximum-entropy optimisation that achieves balance in a single step. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|