Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Теорія процесу нормалізації (NPT)× | Трансфер знань× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Наука про впровадження | Наука про впровадження |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 2006 | 2004 |
| Автор методу≠ | May, C. R. | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) |
| Тип | Framework | Framework |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | May, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004-2009. CIHR, Ottawa. link ↗ |
| Інші назви | NPT, normalization theory, routinization | KT, evidence-to-practice, research-to-practice |
| Пов'язані | 5 | 5 |
| Підсумок≠ | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project. | Knowledge Translation (KT) is the systematic synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of research findings to improve health outcomes and healthcare practice. First formalized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in 2004, KT recognizes that evidence generation alone does not automatically change clinical or policy behaviour, and structures a purposeful process to bridge the gap between research and practice. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|