ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Метод номінальних груп×Дослідження фокус-групи×
ГалузьЯкісні методиЯкісні методи
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи19711940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s
Автор методуAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenRobert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger
ТипQualitative research methodQualitative data collection method
Основоположне джерелоDelbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
Інші назвиNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması
Пов'язані66
ПідсумокThe Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Nominal Group Technique · Focus Group. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare