ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Багатогрупова збіжна валідність×Оцінка багатогрупової дискримінантної валідності×
ГалузьПсихометріяПсихометрія
РодинаLatent structureLatent structure
Рік появи1981 / 20001981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s
Автор методуFornell & Larcker (convergent validity criteria); Vandenberg & Lance (multi-group extension)Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literature
ТипValidity assessment procedureValidity assessment / model comparison
Основоположне джерелоFornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗
Інші назвиcross-group convergent validity, multi-sample convergent validity, MGCFA convergent validity, AVE across groupscross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groups
Пов'язані65
ПідсумокMulti-group convergent validity examines whether items purported to measure the same latent construct relate strongly to that construct consistently across distinct subgroups such as demographic categories, cultures, or experimental conditions. It extends single-sample convergent validity checks into a comparative multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework.Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Multi-group convergent validity · Multi-group discriminant validity. Отримано 2026-06-17 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare