ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Динамічне вирівнювання ентропії×Зважування за показником схильності (PSW / IPW)×
ГалузьПричинно-наслідковий висновокПричинно-наслідковий висновок
РодинаRegression modelRegression model
Рік появи2012-20181983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
Автор методуHainmueller (2012) for static entropy balancing; extended to dynamic settings by Blackwell and Glynn (2018) and subsequent methodologistsRosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
ТипCausal inference / weighting estimatorCausal inference / reweighting
Основоположне джерелоHainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy Balancing for Causal Effects: A Multivariate Reweighting Method to Produce Balanced Samples in Observational Studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25-46. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
Інші назвиDEB, longitudinal entropy balancing, entropy balancing with time-varying treatment, sequential entropy balancingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
Пов'язані66
ПідсумокDynamic Entropy Balancing extends the entropy balancing reweighting approach to settings with time-varying treatments in panel or longitudinal data. It constructs unit weights at each time period such that the covariate distributions of treated and comparison units are balanced on specified moments, adjusting sequentially for prior treatment history and time-varying confounders to estimate the causal effect of treatment sequences on outcomes.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Dynamic Entropy Balancing · Propensity Score Weighting. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare