ScholarGate
Асистент

Порівняння методів

Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.

Центральний аналіз×Виявлення спільнот×Моделі дифузії в мережах×
ГалузьМережевий аналізМережевий аналізМережевий аналіз
РодинаProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Рік появи19792002–2019 (algorithm family)1927 (epidemiological compartmental); 2003 (social influence cascade)
Автор методуLinton C. FreemanLouvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)Kermack & McKendrick (SIR/SIS, 1927); Kempe, Kleinberg & Tardos (Independent Cascade, 2003)
ТипDescriptive / exploratory network measure familyGraph-partitioning / clustering algorithm familyStochastic / deterministic simulation on graphs
Основоположне джерелоFreeman, L.C. (1979). Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239. DOI ↗Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗Kermack, W.O. & McKendrick, A.G. (1927). A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, 115(772), 700-721. DOI ↗
Інші назвиMerkeziyet Analizi (Degree, Betweenness, Eigenvector), node centrality, centrality measures, graph centralitygraph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)epidemic spreading models, compartmental models, influence propagation models, Ağ Yayılım Modelleri (SIR, SIS, Independent Cascade)
Пов'язані555
ПідсумокCentrality analysis is a family of network-analytic measures, formalized by Freeman (1979), that quantifies the structural importance of individual nodes within a graph. Each centrality index captures a distinct mechanism of influence: degree centrality reflects direct connectivity, betweenness centrality identifies nodes that broker information flow, closeness centrality captures proximity to all others, and eigenvector centrality (along with PageRank) rewards connection to highly connected neighbors.Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?Network diffusion models are a family of compartmental and probabilistic frameworks that simulate how information, disease, or innovation spreads across a connected system. Rooted in the mathematical epidemiology of Kermack and McKendrick (1927), the SIR and SIS models partition nodes into states and track transitions driven by contact rates and recovery probabilities. The Independent Cascade and Linear Threshold models, formalised by Kempe, Kleinberg, and Tardos (2003), extend this logic to social influence, modelling how activation propagates through a network one neighbour at a time.
ScholarGateНабір даних
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Джерела
  3. PUBLISHED

Перейти до пошуку Завантажити слайди

ScholarGateПорівняння методів: Centrality Analysis · Community Detection · Network Diffusion Models. Отримано 2026-06-18 з https://scholargate.app/uk/compare