Порівняння методів
Переглядайте обрані методи поруч; рядки з відмінностями підсвічено.
| Шкала академічної самоефективності× | Шкала залученості студентів× | |
|---|---|---|
| Галузь | Педагогічна психологія | Педагогічна психологія |
| Родина | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Рік появи≠ | 1977 | 2004 |
| Автор методу≠ | Albert Bandura | Jennifer Fredricks, Phyllis Blumenfeld, Alison Paris |
| Тип≠ | Self-efficacy belief measurement | Multidimensional engagement assessment |
| Основоположне джерело≠ | Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. DOI ↗ | Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI ↗ |
| Інші назви | ASES, Self-Efficacy for Academic Performance | SES, Academic Engagement Measure |
| Пов'язані | 4 | 4 |
| Підсумок≠ | The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) measures students' beliefs about their capability to succeed in academic tasks. Grounded in Bandura's social cognitive theory, the instrument assesses perceived competence in diverse academic domains—understanding lectures, completing assignments, performing on exams, and engaging in scholarly work. High academic self-efficacy is a strong predictor of achievement, persistence, and resilience in the face of academic challenges. | The Student Engagement Scale (SES) measures the extent to which students are actively involved in academic and social aspects of school or university life. Grounded in Fredricks et al.'s multidimensional framework, the instrument assesses behavioral engagement (participation, attendance, effort), emotional engagement (interest, belonging, enthusiasm), and cognitive engagement (mental effort, deep thinking, persistence). High engagement is consistently associated with better learning outcomes and well-being. |
| ScholarGateНабір даних ↗ |
|
|