Yöntem Karşılaştırma
Seçtiğiniz yöntemleri yan yana inceleyin; farklı satırlar vurgulanır.
| System Justification Scale× | Sağ-Kanat Otoriterliği Ölçeği× | |
|---|---|---|
| Alan≠ | Siyaset psikolojisi | Sosyal psikoloji |
| Aile | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Köken yılı≠ | 1994 | 1981 |
| Köken≠ | John T. Jost & Mahzarin R. Banaji | Bob Altemeyer |
| Tür≠ | Self-report attitude scale | Self-report Likert scale |
| Seminal kaynak≠ | Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27. DOI ↗ | Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press. link ↗ |
| Diğer adlar≠ | SJS, General System Justification Scale, Economic System Justification Scale | RWA |
| İlişkili | 4 | 4 |
| Özet≠ | The System Justification Scale operationalizes system justification theory, introduced by Jost and Banaji (1994), which holds that people are motivated to defend, bolster, and rationalize the existing social, economic, and political status quo, even when doing so runs against their personal or group interest. The general version, refined by Kay and Jost (2003), is an 8-item self-report measure on which respondents rate agreement with statements such as 'In general, the American political system operates as it should' on a 7- or 9-point Likert scale. | The Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWA) is a self-report measure developed by Bob Altemeyer in 1981 to assess individual differences in authoritarian attitudes, including submission to established authorities, adherence to conventional norms, and aggression toward those perceived to violate social conventions. The scale measures three core dimensions: authoritarian submission, authoritarian aggression, and conventionalism. It has become a cornerstone of research on authoritarianism, political attitudes, and intergroup prejudice. |
| ScholarGateVeri seti ↗ |
|
|