Yöntem Karşılaştırma
Seçtiğiniz yöntemleri yan yana inceleyin; farklı satırlar vurgulanır.
| Ethnocentrism Scale× | Ulusal Kimlik Ölçeği× | |
|---|---|---|
| Alan | Siyaset psikolojisi | Siyaset psikolojisi |
| Aile | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Köken yılı≠ | 2001 | 1989 |
| Köken≠ | James W. Neuliep & James C. McCroskey | Richard Kosterman & Seymour Feshbach |
| Tür≠ | Self-report attitude scale | Self-report |
| Seminal kaynak≠ | Neuliep, J. W. (2002). Assessing the reliability and validity of the Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 31(4), 201-215. link ↗ | Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257-274. DOI ↗ |
| Diğer adlar | GENE Scale, Ethnocentrism Scale, Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale | NIS, National Attachment Scale, Patriotism Scale |
| İlişkili≠ | 4 | 3 |
| Özet≠ | The Generalized Ethnocentrism (GENE) Scale, developed by Neuliep and McCroskey, is a self-report instrument measuring ethnocentrism: the tendency to view one's own group as the center of the social universe and to judge other groups by its standards, with corresponding ingroup preference and outgroup derogation. In political science, the ethnocentrism construct was given prominence by Kinder and Kam's (2009) Us Against Them, which uses survey-based ethnocentrism measures to explain American policy opinion. | The National Identity Scale measures the strength and character of individuals' identification with their nation, including attachment to national symbols, pride in national achievements, and sense of belonging to the national community. Developed by Kosterman and Feshbach (1989), it distinguishes patriotism (pride in national accomplishments, willingness to serve) from nationalism (belief in national superiority, willingness to act against outsiders). The measure has become essential in comparative politics, examining how national identity shapes political behavior, attitudes toward immigration, support for international cooperation, and electoral choices. |
| ScholarGateVeri seti ↗ |
|
|