เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| ความเต็มใจที่จะจ่าย (Willingness to Pay: WTP) ในเศรษฐศาสตร์สาธารณสุข× | [UNTRANSLATED]× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | เศรษฐศาสตร์สุขภาพ | เศรษฐศาสตร์สุขภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1980s | 1985 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Carson & Louviere (stated preference/contingent valuation methods) | Alan Williams (Health Economics Research Centre, Oxford University) |
| ประเภท | Method | Method |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Carson, R. T., & Louviere, J. J. (2011). A Common Nomenclature for Stated Choice Studies. In S. Hess & A. Daly (Eds.), Choice Modelling: The State of the Art and the State of Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. link ↗ | Kind, P. (1989). The EuroQol instrument: an index of health-related quality of life. In B. Teeling Smith (Ed.), Measuring health: a practical approach. Chichester: Wiley. link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น≠ | WTP, contingent valuation, stated preference method | QALY, health utility measure |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 5 | 5 |
| สรุป≠ | Willingness to pay (WTP) is an economic valuation method that elicits what individuals or society are willing to spend for a health benefit or to avoid a health risk. Rooted in contingent valuation (Carson & Louviere, 1980s), WTP is used to monetize health outcomes for cost-benefit analysis and to infer implicit cost-effectiveness thresholds from actual healthcare spending patterns. Unlike revealed preference (observing actual spending behavior), WTP uses stated preferences—surveys asking respondents: 'How much would you pay for this health improvement?' | A QALY measures health benefit as utility weight (0 = death, 1 = perfect health) multiplied by time lived. Developed by Alan Williams in 1985, QALYs enable comparison of disparate health interventions on a common metric. Used globally by health technology assessment bodies—NICE (UK), HAS (France), CADTH (Canada), WHO—to decide which treatments deserve public funding. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|