เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	Visual Elicitation Discourse Analysis	การวิเคราะห์วาทกรรมเชิงวิพากษ์
สาขาวิชา	เชิงคุณภาพ	เชิงคุณภาพ
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	Late 1990s–2000s (consolidation as a combined approach)	Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Synthesised from photo-elicitation (Clark, 1969; Harper, 2002) and discourse analysis (Foucault; Fairclough)	Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
ประเภท	Qualitative combined method	Qualitative research method
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	VEDA, photo-elicitation discourse analysis, image-elicitation discourse analysis, visual elicitation interview analysis	CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	5	6
สรุป	Visual Elicitation Discourse Analysis (VEDA) is a qualitative method that uses photographs or other images as interview stimuli to generate participant talk, which is then subjected to systematic discourse analysis. By anchoring conversation in concrete visual materials, VEDA accesses meanings, ideologies, and subject positions that purely verbal questioning often fails to surface. The approach combines the depth of elicitation interviewing with the critical, language-focused rigour of discourse analysis.	Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.