เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| Transition Management× | Technological Innovation Systems× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2001 | 2008 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Jan Rotmans, René Kemp & Derk Loorbach | Anna Bergek, Staffan Jacobsson, Bo Carlsson and colleagues |
| ประเภท≠ | Prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework | Systems-of-innovation framework and scheme of analysis |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161-183. DOI ↗ | Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. DOI ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | TM, Transition governance framework, Transition arena approach | TIS analysis, Technological innovation system approach, Functional dynamics scheme |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 4 | 4 |
| สรุป≠ | Transition Management (TM) is a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework for deliberately steering long-term, structural change in sociotechnical systems toward sustainability. Rather than predicting or controlling outcomes, it organises a cyclical, participatory process—strategic, tactical, operational, and reflexive activities—through which a small group of frontrunners develops shared long-term visions, translates them into agendas and coalitions, mobilises experiments, and continuously monitors and learns. It applies insights from transitions research to the question of how societies might govern their own transformations. | Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) analysis studies the emergence, growth, and performance of a specific technology by treating it as a system of actors, networks, and institutions that interact to generate, diffuse, and use that technology. Building on the systems-of-innovation tradition, the influential scheme of Bergek and colleagues combines a structural account of the system's components with a functional analysis of the key processes—or functions—that an innovation system must perform, then compares achieved with desired functionality to diagnose inducement and blocking mechanisms and derive policy. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|