เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	Sustainable Consumption Scale	มาตรวัดการตระหนักรู้เกี่ยวกับรอยเท้าคาร์บอน
สาขาวิชา	จิตวิทยาสิ่งแวดล้อม	จิตวิทยาสิ่งแวดล้อม
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	2008	2011
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Anna M. Sundström, Iris Vermeir, Wim Verbeke	Alan Collins, Stefan Gössling, C. Michael Hall
ประเภท	Self-report frequency and behavior scale	Self-report awareness and knowledge scale
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Sundström, A. M. (2014). An investigation of the relationship between sustainable values and consumption patterns. In Interdisciplinary book of sustainable development. InTech Press.	Collins, A., Gössling, S., & Hall, C. M. (2011). Assessing the environmental impacts of tourism: Development of a carbon footprint toolkit. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 497–516.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	SCS, Sustainable Lifestyle Scale	CFAS, Carbon Awareness Inventory
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	4	4
สรุป	The Sustainable Consumption Scale (SCS) measures the extent to which individuals adopt sustainable and ethical consumption practices across multiple life domains including food, clothing, household products, transportation, and waste. Developed within ecological economics and consumer behavior frameworks (Sundström, 2014; Vermeir & Verbeke, 2008), the SCS captures integrated sustainable lifestyle rather than isolated green behaviors. The scale is widely used in research on sustainable consumption patterns, consumer segmentation for green marketing, and evaluation of sustainability interventions targeting lifestyle transformation.	The Carbon Footprint Awareness Scale (CFAS) measures individuals' knowledge, consciousness, and sense of responsibility regarding their carbon emissions—how much people understand the carbon impacts of their consumption, energy use, and travel patterns. Developed by Collins, Gössling, and Hall (2011) for sustainability tourism research and extended to general populations, the CFAS captures awareness of carbon-intensive activities, estimation accuracy of personal emissions, and commitment to carbon reduction. The scale is critical for evaluating climate communication effectiveness, identifying knowledge gaps that block behavior change, and assessing whether carbon labeling, footprint calculators, and climate education successfully shift consciousness of personal climate impact.