เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การจับคู่คะแนนแนวโน้มแบบปรับปรุงความแกร่ง× | การถ่วงน้ำหนักด้วยคะแนนแนวโน้ม (Propensity Score Weighting - PSW / IPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | การอนุมานเชิงสาเหตุ | การอนุมานเชิงสาเหตุ |
| ตระกูล | Regression model | Regression model |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2016 (robust variance correction); 1983 (PSM foundations) | 1983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator) |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Abadie & Imbens (2016) for matching-on-estimated-propensity-score with corrected variance; Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983) for PSM foundations | Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting) |
| ประเภท≠ | Quasi-experimental matching estimator with robust inference | Causal inference / reweighting |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2016). Matching on the Estimated Propensity Score. Econometrica, 84(2), 781-807. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | robust PSM, PSM with robust variance, bias-corrected PSM, matching with robust inference | PSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 6 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | Robust Propensity Score Matching (robust PSM) is a quasi-experimental causal inference method that pairs treated and control units on their estimated probability of receiving treatment (the propensity score), then estimates the average treatment effect using variance estimators that account for the uncertainty introduced by estimating the propensity score itself. The correction, developed by Abadie and Imbens (2016), prevents misleading inference that standard bootstrap or analytic formulas produce when applied naively after matching. | Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003). |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|