เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	การวิเคราะห์การอ้างอิงร่วมตามหลัก PRISMA	การวิเคราะห์บรรณานุกรม
สาขาวิชา	วิทยาศาสตรมิติ	วิทยาศาสตรมิติ
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	2009–2021 (methodological combination emerged in the 2010s)	1969 (term coined); practice dates to 1920s–1930s
ผู้ริเริ่ม	PRISMA: Moher et al. (2009), updated Page et al. (2021); Co-citation: Henry Small (1973)	Alan Pritchard (coined term); earlier quantitative work by Paul Otlet (1934) and S. C. Bradford (1934)
ประเภท	Systematic bibliometric review	Quantitative literature analysis
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.	Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	systematic co-citation review, PRISMA co-citation, co-citation analysis with PRISMA reporting, transparent co-citation analysis	bibliometrics, bibliometric study, bibliometric mapping, publication analysis
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	6	6
สรุป	PRISMA-compliant co-citation analysis is a systematic bibliometric method that applies the PRISMA 2020 reporting framework to co-citation analysis. It identifies intellectual clusters in a research field by measuring how frequently pairs of documents are cited together, while ensuring full transparency of the literature search, screening decisions, and analytic choices through a pre-registered protocol and standardised flow diagram.	Bibliometric analysis applies statistical and mathematical methods to bibliographic records — publications, citations, authors, journals, and keywords — to measure and map the structure, output, and intellectual evolution of a research field. It is widely used to identify influential works, prolific authors, productive journals, collaboration networks, and emerging research themes across any academic discipline.