เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	Portfolio Assessment	Rubric Development
สาขาวิชา	Education	Education
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	1992	2007
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Performance-assessment tradition (Arter & Spandel; Koretz; Vermont/Kentucky programs)	Performance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)
ประเภท	Assessment based on a purposeful collection of student work over time	Systematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performance
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Arter, J. A., & Spandel, V. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(1), 36–44.	Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	Educational Portfolio Assessment, Student Portfolio Evaluation, Showcase / Working Portfolio Assessment, Portfolio-Based Assessment	Scoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric Construction
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	4	4
สรุป	Portfolio assessment evaluates learning through a purposeful collection of a student's work assembled over time rather than through a single test. The portfolio may showcase best work, document growth, or demonstrate mastery against standards, and typically includes student selection and reflection. Articulated for education by Arter and Spandel and stress-tested in large-scale programs analyzed by Koretz, it captures authentic, complex performance that on-demand testing misses, while raising distinctive challenges for the reliability and comparability of scores.	Rubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.