เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| มาตรวัดการมีส่วนร่วมทางการเมือง× | Democratic Support Scale× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | จิตวิทยาการเมือง | จิตวิทยาการเมือง |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1995 | 1999 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Sidney Verba, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry Brady | Russell Dalton & Pippa Norris |
| ประเภท | Self-report | Self-report |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. link ↗ | Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | PPCS, Civic Participation Measure, Political Activity Scale | SFD, Democratic Legitimacy Scale, System Support Scale |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 3 | 3 |
| สรุป≠ | The Political Participation Scale measures engagement in civic and political activities, encompassing voting, campaign involvement, contacting officials, organizational membership, community volunteering, and protest activity. Developed by Verba, Schlozman, and Brady (1995), the measure captures both conventional participation (voting, contacting representatives) and unconventional participation (protest, civil disobedience). It addresses fundamental questions in political science: Why do some citizens engage while others withdraw? How do structural resources (time, money, education) and psychological factors (efficacy, interest) drive participation? | The Democratic Support Scale measures citizen commitment to democracy as a regime type, including beliefs that democracy is the best system of government, willingness to defend democratic institutions, and rejection of non-democratic alternatives. Pioneered by Norris (1999) and Dalton (2004) in comparative research, the measure distinguishes regime support (belief in democracy's superiority) from performance support (satisfaction with current government). It addresses the paradox of 'critical citizens'—in advanced democracies, people often express dissatisfaction with current government performance while maintaining deep commitment to democratic principles. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|