ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Participatory Evaluation×Most Significant Change×
สาขาวิชาPublic PolicyPublic Policy
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด19982005
ผู้ริเริ่มJ. Bradley Cousins & Elizabeth WhitmoreRick Davies & Jess Dart
ประเภทCollaborative, stakeholder-engaged evaluation approachParticipatory, story-based monitoring and evaluation technique
แหล่งต้นตำรับCousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. DOI ↗Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The 'Most Significant Change' (MSC) Technique: A Guide to Its Use. link ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นCollaborative Evaluation, Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, Practical Participatory EvaluationMSC, MSC Technique, Story-Based Monitoring, Davies-Dart Most Significant Change
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง44
สรุปParticipatory evaluation is a family of approaches in which stakeholders — program staff, beneficiaries, community members — are engaged as active partners in conducting the evaluation rather than as passive subjects of it. In their influential 1998 framing, J. Bradley Cousins and Elizabeth Whitmore distinguished two streams: practical participatory evaluation, oriented to improving program decisions and use, and transformative participatory evaluation, oriented to empowerment and social justice. What unites them is shared control of the inquiry, but they vary along dimensions of who participates, how much control they hold, and how deeply they are involved.The Most Significant Change (MSC) technique is a participatory, story-based approach to monitoring and evaluation developed by Rick Davies and refined with Jess Dart. It involves the systematic collection of stories of significant change from the field and the deliberative selection of the most significant of these by panels of stakeholders. There are no predefined indicators; instead, value judgements about what change matters most are made transparently by those involved, making MSC especially suited to capturing unexpected and qualitative outcomes in complex programs.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 1 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Participatory Evaluation · Most Significant Change. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-25 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare