ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Outcome Mapping×Contribution Analysis×
สาขาวิชาPublic PolicyPublic Policy
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด20012001
ผู้ริเริ่มSarah Earl, Fred Carden & Terry Smutylo (IDRC)John Mayne
ประเภทActor-centred planning, monitoring and evaluation approachTheory-based approach to causal inference about contribution
แหล่งต้นตำรับEarl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome Mapping: Building Learning and Reflection into Development Programs. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC). ISBN: 9780889369597Mayne, J. (2012). Contribution analysis: Coming of age? Evaluation, 18(3), 270–280. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นOM, IDRC Outcome Mapping, Behavioural Change MappingMayne's Contribution Analysis, Contribution Story Analysis, Theory-Based Contribution Analysis
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง43
สรุปOutcome Mapping is a planning, monitoring and evaluation methodology developed by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and set out by Sarah Earl, Fred Carden and Terry Smutylo in 2001. It redefines results as changes in the behaviour, relationships, activities and actions of the people and organisations a program works with directly — its 'boundary partners' — rather than as downstream development impacts. By focusing on the behavioural changes a program can plausibly influence, Outcome Mapping addresses the attribution problem head-on and shifts evaluation toward learning and contribution.Contribution analysis is a theory-based evaluation approach that addresses the attribution problem — establishing whether and how an intervention made a difference — without relying on an experimental counterfactual. Developed by John Mayne from 2001 onward, it works by articulating the program's theory of change, gathering evidence along that chain, and then assembling a 'contribution story' that is progressively stress-tested against rival explanations. The aim is not statistical attribution but a credible, evidence-based conclusion that the program plausibly contributed to observed results, in the face of other influencing factors.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 1 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Outcome Mapping · Contribution Analysis. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-24 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare