เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การวิเคราะห์บรรณานุกรมเชิงเครือข่าย× | การวิเคราะห์บรรณสารปริมาณ (Scientometric Analysis)× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | วิทยาศาสตรมิติ | วิทยาศาสตรมิติ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1965 (Price); computational refinement 2000s–2010s | 1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work) |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Derek J. de Solla Price (network citation structure); Nees Jan van Eck & Ludo Waltman (computational network mapping) | V. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods) |
| ประเภท≠ | Quantitative bibliometric method | Quantitative literature analysis |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. DOI ↗ | Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka. link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | scientometric network analysis, bibliometric network analysis, citation network scientometrics, science network mapping | scientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 6 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | Network-based scientometric analysis applies graph-theoretic methods to bibliographic data — publications, citations, authors, and keywords — to map the intellectual structure of a scientific field. By modeling documents or authors as nodes and their relationships (citations, co-authorships, co-word occurrences) as edges, it reveals clusters of knowledge, central actors, emerging topics, and the flow of ideas across disciplines. Tools such as VOSviewer, Gephi, and the R package bibliometrix are commonly used. | Scientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|