เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	การวิเคราะห์การอ้างอิงร่วมตามเครือข่าย	การวิเคราะห์บรรณสารปริมาณ (Scientometric Analysis)
สาขาวิชา	วิทยาศาสตรมิติ	วิทยาศาสตรมิติ
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	1973 (co-citation); network-analytic extension widely adopted 2000s–2010s	1969 (term); 1963 (Price's foundational work)
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Henry Small (co-citation foundation); network visualization extended by Chaomei Chen and others	V. V. Nalimov and Z. M. Mulchenko (term coined); Derek J. de Solla Price (foundational methods)
ประเภท	Bibliometric network analysis	Quantitative literature analysis
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.	Nalimov, V. V., & Mulchenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometriya: Izucheniye razvitiya nauki kak informatsionnogo protsessa [Scientometrics: The Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process]. Nauka.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	co-citation network analysis, bibliometric network co-citation, co-citation mapping, CCA network approach	scientometrics, science of science, quantitative science studies, research evaluation analysis
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	6	6
สรุป	Network-based co-citation analysis is a bibliometric technique that measures how often pairs of documents are cited together by later works, then models those relationships as a weighted network. Nodes represent documents (or authors or journals), edges represent co-citation frequency, and network algorithms identify clusters of intellectually related literature. It is widely used in systematic and scoping reviews to map the intellectual structure of a research field.	Scientometric analysis applies statistical and computational methods to publication and citation data to measure the growth, structure, and impact of scientific fields. Drawing on databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, or OpenAlex, it quantifies output trends, identifies leading authors and institutions, maps intellectual networks, and evaluates research impact — transforming large bibliographic corpora into evidence-based portraits of how knowledge develops and spreads.