เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| COPRAS-IN× | กระบวนการวิเคราะห์ลำดับชั้น× | กระบวนการวิเคราะห์เครือข่าย (Analytic Network Process - ANP)× | ระเบียบวิธีดีที่สุด-แย่ที่สุด× | การประเมินสัดส่วนเชิงซ้อน× | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | การตัดสินใจ | การตัดสินใจ | การตัดสินใจ | การตัดสินใจ | การตัดสินใจ |
| ตระกูล | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM | MCDM |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2019 | 1980 | 1996 | 2015 | 1996 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Şahin, R. | Saaty, T. L. | Saaty, T. L. | Rezaei, J. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| ประเภท≠ | Interval Neutrosophic ranking — INN: <[T_L,T_U],[I_L,I_U],[F_L,F_U]> with 0 ≤ T_U+I_U+F_U ≤ 3 | Pairwise comparison (eigenvalue) | Weight_Subjective (pairwise comparison, supermatrix, network structure) | Pairwise comparison (best-to-others + others-to-worst vectors), LP | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Şahin, R. (2019). COPRAS Method with Neutrosophic Sets. Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-Making Using Neutrosophic Sets, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 369, Springer, Cham DOI ↗ | Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN: 978-0070543713 | Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh ISBN: 0-9620317-9-8 | Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | — | — | — | — | — |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| สรุป≠ | N-COPRAS (COPRAS-IN — COPRAS with Interval Neutrosophic Numbers (INN)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Şahin, R. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1980. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | ANP (Analytic Network Process (AHP with feedback and interdependences)) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Saaty, T. L. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | BWM (Best-Worst Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Rezaei, J. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|
|
|
|