เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การวิเคราะห์กรณีศึกษาด้วยภาพแบบหลายกรณี× | การวิเคราะห์ด้วยภาพ× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | เชิงคุณภาพ | เชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2000s–2010s (convergence of case study and visual research traditions) | Formalized in social sciences from the 1980s–2000s |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Synthesised from Robert E. Stake (multiple case design) and Gillian Rose / visual methodologies scholars | Roots in art history and semiotics (Panofsky, Barthes); social science applications developed by Gillian Rose and Marcus Banks |
| ประเภท≠ | Qualitative comparative research design | Qualitative research approach |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple Case Study Analysis. Guilford Press. ISBN: 978-1593852481 | Rose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1473943056 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | multi-case visual analysis, comparative visual case study, cross-case image analysis, MCVA | visual research methods, image analysis, visual inquiry, visual data analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 5 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | Multiple case-based visual analysis is a qualitative design that systematically examines visual materials — photographs, drawings, maps, video stills, or image-rich documents — across two or more purposefully selected cases. By combining Robert Stake's multiple case study logic with visual analysis frameworks, it enables researchers to identify both case-specific visual meanings and cross-case patterns, producing richer comparative insights than either method yields alone. | Visual analysis is a qualitative research approach that systematically examines visual materials — such as photographs, films, artworks, advertisements, and diagrams — to understand how meaning is produced, communicated, and interpreted. Drawing on traditions from art history, semiotics, and social science, it treats visual objects as data that carry social, cultural, and ideological significance. Multiple frameworks exist, from formal compositional analysis to discourse-based and audience-reception approaches. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|