เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การวิเคราะห์วาทกรรมแบบหลายกรณีศึกษา× | การวิเคราะห์วาทกรรมเชิงวิพากษ์× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | เชิงคุณภาพ | เชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1990s–2000s (integration formalized in qualitative methodology literature) | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Synthesized from Yin's multiple case study design and discourse analysis traditions (van Dijk, Fairclough) | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| ประเภท≠ | Comparative qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | multi-case discourse analysis, comparative discourse analysis, cross-case discourse analysis, MCDA | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 5 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | Multiple case-based discourse analysis is a qualitative research design that applies systematic discourse analysis within each of two or more purposively selected cases, then compares the discursive patterns, themes, and power relations across those cases. It combines the replication logic of Yin's multiple case study methodology with the text- and talk-centred analytical tools of discourse analysis traditions such as critical discourse analysis or conversation analysis, enabling researchers to build comparative, theoretically grounded accounts of how language constructs social reality across different contexts. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|