เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การรวบรวมเอกสารจากหลายแหล่ง (Multi-source Document Collection)× | การรวบรวมเอกสาร× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | ระเบียบวิธีสำรวจ | ระเบียบวิธีสำรวจ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1970s–2000s (systematic articulation) | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Rooted in qualitative documentary traditions; codified in mixed-methods and triangulation literature (Denzin 1970s; Bowen 2009) | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen |
| ประเภท≠ | Data collection strategy | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | multi-source documentary research, multiple-document data collection, multi-site document analysis, cross-source document gathering | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 3 | 3 |
| สรุป≠ | Multi-source document collection is a data-gathering strategy in which researchers systematically locate, retrieve, and compare documents drawn from two or more independent sources — such as government archives, institutional records, media outlets, organisational reports, or digital repositories. By assembling evidence from diverse provenance, researchers can triangulate findings, detect discrepancies, and build a richer, more credible picture of the phenomenon under study than any single documentary source can provide. | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|