เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| รายงานผู้ป่วยที่จับคู่× | การศึกษาแบบกลุ่ม (Cohort Study)× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | ระบาดวิทยา | ระบาดวิทยา |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | Late 20th century (widely used from 1990s onward in pharmacovigilance and rare-disease literature) | Mid-20th century (formal epidemiological design codified ~1950s) |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Evolved from standard clinical case reporting practice; no single originator | Doll & Hill (British Doctors Study, 1951); Snow (cholera, 1854) |
| ประเภท≠ | Observational descriptive design with comparator | Observational longitudinal study design |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Gagnier, J. J., Kienle, G., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., Sox, H., & Riley, D. (2013). The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 7, 223. DOI ↗ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | matched case write-up, case report with matched comparator, matched single-case report, comparator-matched case report | longitudinal study, follow-up study, panel study, incidence study |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 5 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | A matched case report is a structured clinical case write-up in which the index patient is compared against one or more systematically selected matched comparators — typically patients with similar demographics, comorbidities, or clinical settings who did not experience the same unusual outcome. The matched comparator contextualises the index case, strengthening causal inference beyond what a conventional single case report can support, and is used particularly in pharmacovigilance, rare-disease documentation, and novel-intervention reporting. | A cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point — typically freedom from the outcome of interest — and follows them over time to observe who develops the outcome. By comparing incidence rates between exposed and unexposed subgroups, researchers can estimate relative risk and absolute risk differences. Cohort studies are the gold-standard observational design for measuring disease incidence and establishing temporal relationships between exposure and outcome. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|