ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Many-Facet Rasch Measurement×Rubric Development×
สาขาวิชาEducationEducation
ตระกูลLatent structureProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด19892007
ผู้ริเริ่มJohn Michael LinacrePerformance-assessment tradition (Andrade; Arter & McTighe; Jonsson & Svingby synthesis)
ประเภทRasch model extension adding rater and other facets to person and itemSystematic design of criterion-based scoring guides for performance
แหล่งต้นตำรับLinacre, J. M. (1989). Many-Facet Rasch Measurement. MESA Press. ISBN: 9780941938020Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130–144. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นMFRM, Many-Faceted Rasch Model, Facets Model, Linacre Facets ModelScoring Rubric Design, Analytic and Holistic Rubrics, Performance Scoring Guides, Rubric Construction
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง44
สรุปMany-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) extends the basic Rasch model to assessments mediated by raters. Beyond examinee ability and item difficulty, it adds explicit parameters for rater severity and for any other facet of the rating situation — task, occasion, rating criterion — placing them all on one common logit scale. Developed by John Michael Linacre, MFRM lets analysts estimate and adjust for the fact that some raters are systematically harsh and others lenient, producing 'fair' ability estimates that do not penalize an examinee for happening to draw a severe judge.Rubric development is the systematic design of criterion-referenced scoring guides for judging complex performance such as writing, projects, presentations, and problem solving. A rubric specifies the dimensions on which work is evaluated and describes, in ordered levels, what each degree of quality looks like. Done well — as the syntheses by Andrade and by Jonsson and Svingby show — rubrics make scoring more reliable and transparent, clarify expectations for students, and turn assessment into a tool for learning rather than merely a verdict.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement · Rubric Development. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-25 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare