เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| Logic Model× | Program Evaluation in Social Work× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | Social Work | Social Work |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด | 2004 | 2004 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Program-evaluation tradition; popularized by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation | Evaluation-research tradition (Rossi, Lipsey, Freeman); social-work application by Royse, Thyer & Padgett |
| ประเภท≠ | Diagram linking program resources and activities to intended outcomes | Systematic assessment of the need, design, implementation, and outcomes of a program |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. link ↗ | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 9780761908944 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | Program Logic Model, Logical Framework, Program Theory Model, Logic Model (Social Work) | Social Program Evaluation, Human Services Program Evaluation, Outcome and Process Evaluation, Evaluation Research (Social Work) |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 4 | 4 |
| สรุป≠ | A logic model is a diagram that lays out the intended logic of a program — how its resources and activities are expected to produce outputs and, through them, short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes. Popularized in human services by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation's development guide, it makes a program's underlying theory of change explicit and testable, providing the backbone for program planning, communication with stakeholders, and evaluation by clarifying exactly what the program does and what it is supposed to achieve. | Program evaluation in social work is the systematic application of social-science methods to judge a program's need, design, implementation, outcomes, and efficiency, in order to improve programs and inform decisions about them. Drawing on the evaluation-research tradition of Rossi, Lipsey, and Freeman and adapted for social work by Royse, Thyer, and Padgett, it spans a hierarchy of evaluation questions — from whether a program is needed and well-conceived to whether it is delivered as intended, produces the intended outcomes, and is worth its cost. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|