เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| Inverse Probability Weighting for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects (HTE-IPW)× | การประมาณค่าแบบทนทานสองเท่า (AIPW)× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | การอนุมานเชิงสาเหตุ | การอนุมานเชิงสาเหตุ |
| ตระกูล | Regression model | Regression model |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2003–2015 | 2005 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Hirano, Imbens & Ridder; further developed by Abrevaya, Hsu & Lieli | Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins |
| ประเภท≠ | Causal inference / weighted regression | Semiparametric causal estimator |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Hirano, K., Imbens, G. W., & Ridder, G. (2003). Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71(4), 1161-1189. DOI ↗ | Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | HTE-IPW, CATE-IPW, heterogeneous IPW, conditional effect IPW | AIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW) |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 5 | 5 |
| สรุป≠ | HTE-IPW extends standard inverse probability weighting to recover how causal effects vary across subgroups or covariate values. By reweighting each observation by the inverse of its estimated treatment probability, the method creates a pseudo-population in which treatment is independent of background characteristics, and then estimates conditional average treatment effects (CATEs) as a function of those characteristics. | Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|