ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Foreign Policy Similarity Score×Alliance Portfolio Similarity×
สาขาวิชาInternational RelationsInternational Relations
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด20111999
ผู้ริเริ่มForeign-policy-similarity literature (Signorino & Ritter; Voeten ideal points; Frank Häge chance correction)Bueno de Mesquita (Tau-b); Curtis Signorino & Jeffrey Ritter (S)
ประเภทDyadic measurement of revealed foreign-policy agreementDyadic similarity index over alliance commitment profiles
แหล่งต้นตำรับHäge, F. M. (2011). Choice or circumstance? Adjusting measures of foreign policy similarity for chance agreement. Political Analysis, 19(3), 287–305. DOI ↗Signorino, C. S., & Ritter, J. M. (1999). Tau-b or not Tau-b: Measuring the similarity of foreign policy positions. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 115–144. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นForeign Policy Similarity Measurement, UN Voting Affinity Score, Ideal Point Distance, State Preference SimilarityAlliance Portfolio Similarity Scores, S-Score of Alliance Similarity, Tau-b Alliance Similarity, Alliance Profile Similarity
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง33
สรุปA foreign-policy similarity score measures how alike two states' revealed foreign-policy positions are — most commonly from their votes in the UN General Assembly, but also from alliance portfolios or treaty positions. It is a workhorse measure of shared interests, affinity, and alignment in dyadic IR. Häge (2011) shows that naive agreement and the popular S-score can be inflated by chance agreement that arises because states differ in how often they take each position, and proposes chance-corrected indices (Scott's π, Cohen's κ) that better isolate genuine alignment.Alliance portfolio similarity measures how alike two states' overall patterns of alliance commitments are. Each state has a 'portfolio' — the profile of defense pacts, neutrality agreements, ententes, or no tie it holds with every other state — and the similarity of two portfolios is summarized in a single dyadic score. Signorino and Ritter (1999) showed that the long-dominant Kendall's tau-b measure is flawed for this purpose and introduced the S-score as a better-behaved alternative. These scores are a standard proxy for shared interests and have been used to operationalize utilities in expected-utility models of war.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 1 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Foreign Policy Similarity Score · Alliance Portfolio Similarity. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-25 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare