ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

การวิจัยแบบกลุ่มสนทนา×การสัมภาษณ์เชิงลึก×การสัมภาษณ์กึ่งโครงสร้าง×
สาขาวิชาเชิงคุณภาพเชิงคุณภาพเชิงคุณภาพ
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด1940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990sMid-20th century (formalised in qualitative social research from the 1950s onward)1946 (Merton & Kendall); codified as a standard method through the 1980s–1990s
ผู้ริเริ่มRobert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. KruegerRooted in sociological interviewing traditions; systematised by researchers including Steinar Kvale and Herbert J. RubinRobert K. Merton and Patricia Kendall (focused interview, 1946); further systematised by Steinar Kvale
ประเภทQualitative data collection methodQualitative research methodQualitative research method
แหล่งต้นตำรับKrueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803958203Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761925422
ชื่อเรียกอื่นfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup AraştırmasıIDI, semi-structured interview, unstructured interview, qualitative interviewguided interview, semi-standardized interview, focused interview, SSI
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง666
สรุปFocus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.The in-depth interview is a one-to-one qualitative data-collection method in which a researcher engages a participant in an extended, open-ended conversation to elicit rich, detailed accounts of experiences, perceptions, beliefs, or meanings. Unlike structured surveys, the interview guide serves as a flexible road map rather than a fixed script, allowing the researcher to probe unexpected directions as they emerge. The approach is foundational to qualitative inquiry and is used directly as a primary method or as the data-collection arm of phenomenology, grounded theory, narrative analysis, and other frameworks.The semi-structured interview is a qualitative data-collection method in which the researcher prepares a set of key questions or topic areas in advance but remains free to probe, follow up, and reorder as the conversation evolves. Unlike structured interviews — which fix every question and sequence — or unstructured interviews — which are entirely open — the semi-structured format balances comparability across participants with the flexibility needed to capture the depth and nuance of individual perspectives. It is the most widely used interview format in social science, health, and education research.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 1 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Focus Group · In-Depth Interview · Semi-Structured Interview. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-17 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare