เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การวิจัยเอกสารจดหมายเหตุทางประวัติศาสตร์ดิจิทัล× | ระเบียบวิธีประวัติศาสตร์บอกเล่า× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | วิธีการภาคสนาม | วิธีการภาคสนาม |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1990s–2000s (as digital archives became widely accessible) | 1948 (systematic practice); broader theorisation 1970s–1990s |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Emerging practice across digital humanities scholars; Roy Rosenzweig among early proponents | Columbia University Oral History Research Office (Allan Nevins); later theorised by Alessandro Portelli and Donald Ritchie |
| ประเภท≠ | Qualitative historical research design | Qualitative historical-empirical method |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Theimer, K. (2012). What is the Meaning of Archives 2.0? American Archivist, 75(1), 58–68. DOI ↗ | Ritchie, D. A. (2015). Doing Oral History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0199329960 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | digital archival research, digital archive history, online archival research, digital humanities archival method | oral history research, life history interviewing, oral testimony research, OHM |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 5 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | Digital historical archival research is the systematic investigation of the past using digitized primary sources held in online repositories, digital archives, and electronic databases. It combines the interpretive principles of traditional historical archival research with digital tools for search, retrieval, text mining, and visualization, enabling researchers to access geographically dispersed collections, apply computational analysis to large corpora, and reconstruct historical events, processes, and social phenomena from preserved primary evidence. | The oral history method is a qualitative research approach in which researchers conduct in-depth, recorded interviews with individuals who have direct personal experience of a historical event, social process, or community life. It captures subjective perspectives, memory, and lived experience that written records rarely preserve, making it indispensable for recovering voices absent from official archives — particularly those of marginalised communities, minority groups, and ordinary people. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|