เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| Deliberative Polling× | Participatory Evaluation× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1991 | 1998 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | James S. Fishkin | J. Bradley Cousins & Elizabeth Whitmore |
| ประเภท≠ | Deliberative survey method | Collaborative, stakeholder-engaged evaluation approach |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300051636 | Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5–23. DOI ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | Deliberative Poll, Deliberative Opinion Poll, Fishkin Deliberative Polling | Collaborative Evaluation, Stakeholder-Based Evaluation, Practical Participatory Evaluation |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 4 | 4 |
| สรุป≠ | Deliberative Polling is a method, devised by James Fishkin, that combines the representativeness of a scientific opinion survey with the informed reflection of deliberation. A large, random and representative sample of citizens is first polled on an issue, then gathered to deliberate over balanced materials and dialogue with experts and one another, and finally polled again. The change between the before and after surveys reveals what the public would think about an issue if it were genuinely informed and had the opportunity to consider it — Fishkin's idea of 'counterfactual' or considered public opinion. | Participatory evaluation is a family of approaches in which stakeholders — program staff, beneficiaries, community members — are engaged as active partners in conducting the evaluation rather than as passive subjects of it. In their influential 1998 framing, J. Bradley Cousins and Elizabeth Whitmore distinguished two streams: practical participatory evaluation, oriented to improving program decisions and use, and transformative participatory evaluation, oriented to empowerment and social justice. What unites them is shared control of the inquiry, but they vary along dimensions of who participates, how much control they hold, and how deeply they are involved. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|