เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การวิเคราะห์อุปมานัยเชิงวิพากษ์× | การวิเคราะห์วาทกรรมเชิงตีความ× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | เชิงคุณภาพ | เชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 2004 | 1980s–1990s |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Jonathan Charteris-Black | Rooted in interpretivist social science; systematised by Norman Fairclough, Margaret Wetherell, and others |
| ประเภท≠ | Qualitative-critical textual analysis | Qualitative interpretive research approach |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-1403932921 | Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse Analysis: Investigating Processes of Social Construction. Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761923343 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | CMA, critical metaphor research, corpus-based critical metaphor analysis, ideological metaphor analysis | IDA, interpretivist discourse analysis, discourse analysis (interpretive), meaning-focused discourse analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 5 | 6 |
| สรุป≠ | Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) is a qualitative method for uncovering how metaphorical language constructs, legitimises, or contests power relations and ideological positions in texts. Developed by Jonathan Charteris-Black (2004), it integrates Conceptual Metaphor Theory with the evaluative concerns of Critical Discourse Analysis to reveal the persuasive and ideological work performed by metaphors in political, institutional, and media discourse. | Interpretive discourse analysis is a qualitative approach that examines how language constructs social realities, identities, and meanings within specific contexts. Operating from an interpretivist epistemology, it treats texts and talk not as transparent windows onto the world but as active sites where meaning is negotiated, and it seeks to understand those meanings from the perspective of participants situated within their social and cultural worlds. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|